Binding and Loosing

I had breakfast this morning with a parishioner and friend, WEV.  During the course of our conversation, he mentioned how much he’s enjoyed our journey through Romans 12 over the past two weeks.  At one point he said something to the effect of, “I get the idea of an Acts 2 or and Acts 8 church, but I really want to be part of a Romans 12 church.”  I’m sure he’ll comment here if I ask him what he thinks of being a Matthew 18 church?

The lesson for Sunday is a profoundly dangerous one, which has, as you might expect, been utilized by less than scrupulous religious leaders to oppress and victimize the faithful.  Because of that, many will suggest that we just ignore Matthew 18:15-20, which is, I suspect, precisely why the RCL has decided to include it in the three year lectionary.  This whole notion of binding and loosing, a power which was given exclusively to Peter in Matthew 16:19 is now being given to all of the disciples in 18:18.  Taken with the “If two of you agree on anything, it will be done for you,” the preacher is presented with a particular challenge this Sunday.

  • Some Christians forbid dancing, so is dancing forbidden in heaven?  And if so, how come both of my children have been dancing since before they could walk?


  • Some Christians forbid alcohol, so is alcohol forbidden in heaven?  And if so, why did Jesus use wine for his Last Supper and command us to “do this in remembrance” of him?
  • Some Christians allow for same-sex marriage, so are same-sex relationships allowed for in heaven? And if so, why do so many others agree that they aren’t?
  • Some Christians take Mark 16:9-20 literally, so is snake handling cool in heaven?  And if so, why do so many others think the long ending of Mark is a late addition?

The list of these questions goes on and on.  In the end, they are all quite unhelpful because the Church has been shifting the list of what is bound and what is loosed since the very beginning: from circumcision and the Law of Moses to whether priests can get married to whether women can be ordained to whether Jesus can be manifest gluten free bread.  What is helpful, however, is that Matthew 18:15-20 reminds that we are part of something much larger than our own congregational context.  As Christians, we take our place in a long history of people who have struggled with how best to be disciples of Jesus.  From Peter and Paul to you and me, we do our best to follow Jesus, but each of us fails from time to time.  Each of us needs to seek forgiveness and be restored to right relationship with God and one another.  The good news is that we aren’t making it all up as we go along.  Instead, we have 2,000 years of examples of those who have done it well and those who have failed miserably to try to figure out how we, in our place and time, can follow Jesus as faithfully as possible.

3 thoughts on “Binding and Loosing

  1. Matthew 18 wasn’t part of our conversation this morning, primarily because our intrepid blogger had not yet read the Lectionary for this week. But he apparently caught up on his reading, and now I find myself obligated to compare this scripture to Romans 12, and to consider “what kind of church” I prefer.
    First of all, my enthusiastic comments about Romans 12 are the result of SJP’s blogs last week regarding the “thou shall’s” and the “thou shall not’s”, and his excellent (as usual) sermon on Romans 12 a week ago. Beginning with a most profound “Therefore”, Paul describes how followers of Jesus should live their (our, my) lives “as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God”, emphasizing loving service to others, and calling us to be “joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer.”
    Matthew 18: 15-20 is a complex passage in the middle of a complicated chapter, full of opportunities for contradictory interpretation. I believe the key phrase in this scripture is in verse 20: “where two or three gather IN MY NAME…” Jesus should be in the center of our thoughts and words and actions. It’s not about us, or our assertions that we know what is “right”. It’s about being a “living sacrifice”, filled with love, service, joy, hope, patience, and faith. You know, sort of how Paul described it. That’s my kind of church.

  2. I had this zen like or otherwise eastern perspective on binding and loosing recently– that it has something to do with our spiritual capacity- that if I can see a way that something “unusual” is also life giving and good. Jesus will redeem it, likewise if I can see through societally imposed blinders that something we all tend to accept is hurtful or life-sapping, Jesus will will fortify resistance to the norm. Thought I’d share. Love the site/blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s